Paul Hastings finance lawyer Molen: Credit deals must be 'airtight'

Posted on September 19, 2008 13:53 by Andy Peters

With the unprecedented upheaval in financial markets causing a near-lockdown in global credit markets, Deal Watch Blog called Chris Molen, a partner with Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker in Atlanta, to discuss how the chaos on Wall Street is affecting corporate borrowers. Lehman Brothers

Molen advises clients on financing mergers and acquisitions, asset-based financing, cash flow lending, structured finance and restructuring senior debt financings. Molen’s clients have included Bank of America, Toronto-Dominion Bank, SunTrust Banks and Wells Fargo.

The conversation was edited for brevity and clarity.

Various news reports have said that the global credit markets have virtually locked down. Can you comment on what you’re seeing in the market—who can find financing and what lenders are providing credit right now?

The AAA investment-grade type companies can still find financing. I’m talking about long-term credit facilities of one year to five years, term loans of one year to seven years, your traditional corporate loans. Probably there are solid [privately held] companies with a long track record and who have a relationship with their lender; they may be able to find some financing.

What the big banks’ philosophy is right now is that the deal has got to be really solid from a credit perspective. A deal has also got to have the prospect for other fee opportunities—providing advice on future bond issues, or cash management, some other kind of fee income. A bank wants a customer whose credit is beyond reproach and for whom they might be able to pick up other fee-earning opportunities.

A couple of years ago, even five years ago, there was plenty of money chasing deals. Lenders—banks, hedge funds, others—were quite happy to simply make loans and not worry about other fee income. That’s not the case now.

What type of banks and what size banks are not extending credit right now?

Banks who are watching their capital positions and who are under scrutiny from regulators regarding their own viability are really protective of their capital. Capital is so precious that the lenders don’t want to put it out for a mere loan unless it’s airtight, or if they’ve got the prospect for future fee opportunities.

The other thing that’s going on right now, the whole Lehman Brothers  problem has lenders scurrying around to determine to what extent Lehman is involved in credit facilities they’re involved in and whether Lehman is going to be able to meet its obligations.  If Lehman isn’t going to be able to meet its obligations, that could affect a borrower’s ability to make acquisitions, or they’ll have to limit their capital expenditures. These other lenders who are participating with Lehman, they’re not taking on Lehman’s credit risk. It’s more of an indirect issue, what’s the impact on the borrower. They’re not going to have to stand good for Lehman.

Are there any specific segments of the economy that are in trouble because they’re going to have particular difficulty in getting access to credit?

The industries that are certainly on watch lists are the big-box retailers and restaurant chains. I’m talking about restaurants in mid-priced customer category, not the low-priced or the high-end, luxury restaurant chains. The mid-priced restaurant chains, their problems really started with the rise in oil prices and the unwillingness of people to frequent those restaurants because they weren’t willing to make the drive to get there. These restaurants’ lack of revenue has affected their creditworthiness.

Residential real estate development has been considerably low for some time now. Is commercial real estate development about to start to slow significantly because of a lack of access to credit?

Absolutely. You’re already seeing a lot of projects slowing down, locally, nationally and internationally. I think we’re going to see a slowdown in the construction of new office buildings.

If domestic lenders are reluctant to provide credit, are non-U.S. lenders going to fill the void?

Certainly sovereign wealth funds [investment funds controlled by foreign governments] will increasingly be putting money into the U.S. But there is a limit to what they can do. They have only certain targeted investments they can make. Six months ago, there were a lot of foreign lenders who could take advantage of the situation in the U.S. But what’s going on right now, it has rippled through Europe, Asia, Russia; it’s affecting institutions and financial central banks around the world. I don’t think the answer in the very short run is a big increase in foreign investment. We’ve just got to ride it out. This downturn is as ugly as any I can remember, but they tend to run their course.

Why is private equity predominantly sitting on the sidelines during the turmoil? Private equity has got billions of dollars in capital waiting to be invested.

Private equity is spending capital to deal with problems in their own portfolio companies. Also, the way they make money is by leveraging their equity investments. If they can’t borrow against that equity infusion by a multiple of four or five times, they don’t make the returns their investors are used to.


More about:
E-mail | Share on Facebook | del.icio.us | Permalink | Add a comment | Comments (0) | Comment RSSRSS comment feed

Add comment


 

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading



ADVERTISEMENT
An Affiliate of the Law.com Network
Sign up to receive Legal Blog Watch by email
From the Law.com Newswire

[about RSS] Law.com Privacy Policy

Categories

Recent posts

Archive

About this blog

Janet ConleyThe Deal Watch Blog is devoted to bringing you the latest news in business law in Atlanta, the Southeast and the U.S. The lead writer is Daily Report associate editor Janet L. Conley.

Janet L. Conley is an attorney who returned to journalism after practicing law with Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld in Washington and with the Georgia Legal Services Program in Atlanta.

During her tenure at the Daily Report, Janet, now the paper's associate editor, has covered law firm economics and management, business and federal courts. In 2007, she received the Georgia Associated Press Story of the Year award and the Atlanta Press Club’s Journalist of the Year award, both for small circulation newspapers, for "Green to Gold," a series of articles on how climate change will alter business and the law.

Janet has written for The American Lawyer magazine and the National Law Journal, among other publications. She also served as managing editor of GC South magazine.

Janet holds a journalism degree from Southern College and a juris doctor degree from the University of Pennsylvania. She lives in Decatur with her husband Mark Harper, also an attorney, and their three children.

She can be reached at jconley@alm.com.

Andy PetersThe contributing writer is Daily Report staff reporter Andy Peters.

Andy Peters has been a journalist since graduating from Furman University in 1992. A short list of the subjects he’s covered includes the Georgia state Legislature, the U.S. semiconductor industry, the Alabama-Florida-Georgia “water wars” litigation, the 1999 American Airlines pilots strike, Coca-Cola and PepsiCo’s battle to acquire the Gatorade sports-drink brand, indie rock music and high school football. Andy has written for Bloomberg News, the New York Times Web site, the Macon Telegraph, the Spartanburg (S.C.) Herald-Journal and the Atlanta Business Chronicle.

Andy has written the Deal Watch column for the Daily Report since March 2006. He was born in Chattanooga, Tenn. in 1971 and grew up in Ringgold, Ga. He lives in Decatur with his wife and two children.

He can be reached at apeters@alm.com.

Blogroll







Sign in